Peer Reviewer’s Feedback
Title of the Article/Research Paper:
Kindly use the following five point rating scale to evaluate the worthiness of the article:
Excellent=1
Very Good=2
Good=3
Average=4
Poor=5
NA= Not Applicable
Kindly bold the scoring given below against each criterion to indicate your response.
S. No. | Criteria for Evaluation | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | NA |
1 |
The article is based on rigorous research and academic standards. |
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | NA |
2 | The article is written in proper format as per the recent trend and easily accessible to the readers. |
1 |
2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
NA |
3 |
The article is well presented, clearly written and systematically organized. |
1 |
2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
NA |
4 |
The article has followed brief abstract and proper introduction supported by evidence. |
1 |
2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
NA |
5 |
The article has well grounded rationale and need for the undertaken study. |
1 |
2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
NA |
6 |
The article has followed systematic and proper methodology such as research design, sampling technique, reliability and validity of the tool, data collection procedure and data analysis. |
1 |
2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
NA |
7 |
The article has clear result based on analysis and discussions are based on the results. |
1 |
2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
NA |
8 |
The article has clearly mentioned implication and conclusion of the study and whether they are useful and relevant. Whether all references cited are correct. |
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
NA |
9 |
The article is interesting and will be able to contribute for the knowledge of the field of special education and disability management. |
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
NA |
10 |
The article has easy readability and free from grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors. |
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
NA |
Reviewer’s Recommendation
1 |
2 | 3 | 4 |
Rejection | Consider after major modifications | Consider after minor modifications | Accept the article |
No rush | Give medium priority | Give high priority |
Reviewer’s Comments and Suggestions for the Author (s)
Strength of the article/research paper
1
2.
3.
4.
Minor weaknesses and suggestions
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Major weaknesses and suggestions
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
—————————————————————————————————————————————–